The short answer
There are four ways advisors get paid, and one number that matters more than which one you choose.
| Model | Typical 2026 price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of assets (AUM) | 0.50% to 1.25% a year | Ongoing management plus planning, billed quarterly from the account |
| Flat annual retainer | $2,400 to $8,000 a year | Comprehensive planning without asset custody requirements |
| One-time plan | About $2,400 median, $850 for a modular plan | A written plan and a few implementation meetings |
| Hourly | $220 to $240 an hour median | Project work: a Roth decision, a claiming analysis, a portfolio review |
| Commission | 0% to 5.75% of the amount invested, or 1% to 8% of an insurance premium | Product sale, with no ongoing advice obligation implied |
Kitces Research puts the median standalone comprehensive plan at roughly $2,400, hourly medians at $220 to $238, and planning-only retainers at a median of $5,000 a year, or about $2,400 when paired with an asset-based fee (Kitces.com). The number that matters more is the all-in total, which we get to below.
What AUM fees really look like by tier
The "1% advisor fee" is a marginal fee for portfolios near $1 million, not a universal rate. Research by Bob Veres' Inside Information, summarized by Kitces, surveyed nearly 1,000 advisors and found median advisory fees of almost 1.25% below $250,000, 1.00% up to $1 million, 0.85% above $1 million, 0.75% above $2 million, 0.65% above $3 million and 0.50% above $5 million, with more than 10% of advisors charging 0.25% or less above $5 million (Kitces.com).
Most firms apply those rates as breakpoints, not flat rates. A common schedule:
| Asset band | Marginal rate | Fee on that band |
|---|---|---|
| First $250,000 | 1.25% | $3,125 |
| Next $750,000 | 1.00% | $7,500 |
| Next $1,000,000 | 0.85% | $8,500 |
| Next $2,000,000 | 0.70% | $14,000 |
| Above $5,000,000 | 0.50% | Varies |
Under that schedule a $1 million portfolio pays $10,625, a blended 1.06%. A $2 million portfolio pays $19,125, a blended 0.96%, even though the marginal rate at the margin is 0.85%. That is why you must ask for the blended dollar figure, not the tier. Doubling the portfolio rarely doubles the fee.
Ask for it in dollars. "What will I pay in year one, in dollars, including fund expenses and any platform fee?" A firm that cannot answer in one sentence is a firm you should keep shopping against.
Flat, retainer and hourly pricing
Fee-for-service pricing has grown quickly because it separates advice from asset size. A household with $180,000 invested and a complicated situation, equity compensation, a small business, a special-needs child, can be badly served by an AUM fee that produces $2,250 of revenue while consuming 15 hours of work.
Flat annual retainers
Commonly $3,000 to $8,000 a year for a household with one or two moderately complex issues, billed monthly or quarterly. Kitces Research found a $5,000 median among advisors charging retainers only. Watch for retainers that quietly scale with income or net worth, which is an AUM fee wearing a different hat.
One-time and modular plans
A full written plan at roughly $2,400 median, or a modular plan, one topic only, at a median near $850 in the FPA data Kitces cites. Good fit if you are a competent do-it-yourself investor who wants a second set of eyes every few years.
Hourly
At $220 to $240 an hour, a claiming analysis or a Roth conversion review runs $700 to $1,800. Kitces found cumulative hourly fees had no predictive relationship to a client's income, assets or net worth, meaning hourly pricing is the one model that genuinely charges for work rather than wealth.
Commissions, 12b-1 fees and loads
Commission compensation has not disappeared; it moved inside products.
- Front-end sales loads. The SEC's own example: a 5% load on a $10,000 purchase takes $500 off the top, so only $9,500 is invested (Investor.gov). Breakpoints reduce the rate at higher purchase amounts.
- Contingent deferred sales charges. A back-end load paid at redemption, declining to zero the longer you hold. Read the prospectus schedule before you buy, not after.
- 12b-1 fees. Distribution and service fees paid out of fund assets to cover marketing and to compensate the brokers and platforms that sell the shares. They are typically a mutual fund feature rather than an ETF one, and they sit inside the expense ratio, so you never see a bill. Kitces notes some funds pay a platform 0.25% through 12b-1 fees.
- Insurance and annuity commissions. Paid by the carrier out of the premium, which is why a product recommendation can feel free at the point of sale. See annuities explained for how surrender schedules relate to the commission paid.
Commission is not automatically wrong; a term life policy bought once for a 20-year need is cheaper on commission than under a 1% fee. The problem is a commission paid on a product that is presented as advice.
All-in cost: the number almost nobody quotes
Your total drag is the advisory fee plus fund expense ratios plus trading plus any platform fee. The Kitces analysis of the Veres data reports median all-in costs of:
| Portfolio size | Median all-in cost | Advisory fee | Everything else |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $250,000 | 1.85% | ~1.25% | 0.60% to 0.85% |
| Up to $500,000 | 1.75% | ~1.10% | ~0.65% |
| Up to $1 million | 1.65% | 1.00% | 0.65% |
| Over $1 million | 1.50% | 0.85% | 0.65% |
| Over $2 million | 1.40% | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Over $3 million | 1.30% | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Over $5 million | 1.20% | 0.50% | 0.70% |
Two things jump out. First, the typical advised household pays more than 1.5% a year, not 1%. Second, the non-advisory layer stays remarkably fixed at roughly 0.60% to 0.70% across every account size, because expense ratios and platform fees do not fall as your balance grows. In that survey blended fund expense ratios mostly ran 0.20% to 0.75% with a median of 0.50%, trading costs clustered around 0.05%, and among the 20%-plus of advisors reporting a platform fee the median was 0.20%.
That 0.65% layer is the most negotiable part of your bill, because index funds and ETFs at 0.03% to 0.10% are available on every major custodian. Cutting a 0.55% blended expense ratio to 0.08% saves nearly half a percent a year and requires no conversation about your advisor's worth.
What 1% costs over 30 years, with the math
The SEC's fee bulletin makes the shape of the problem clear: $100,000 invested for 20 years at 4% growth ends near $208,000 with a 0.25% annual fee, $198,000 at 0.50%, and $179,000 at 1.00% (Investor.gov). A three-quarter-point difference costs $29,000 on a $100,000 account in 20 years.
Extend it to 30 years on a larger balance. Start with $500,000, add nothing, and assume a 7% gross return:
| Annual cost | Net return | Value after 30 years | Lost to fees |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.10% | 6.90% | $3.70 million | $110,000 |
| 0.60% | 6.40% | $3.21 million | $600,000 |
| 1.00% | 6.00% | $2.87 million | $940,000 |
| 1.65% | 5.35% | $2.38 million | $1.43 million |
The arithmetic: $500,000 at 1.07 to the 30th power is about $3.81 million gross. At 6.00% it is $2.87 million, so one point of annual cost consumes roughly 25% of the ending balance. Move from 1.00% to the 1.65% median all-in figure and the loss reaches 37%. In withdrawal terms, a $1 million portfolio paying 1.65% hands over $16,500 a year, which is 42% of the $39,000 a 3.9% withdrawal rate would fund. See how much do I need to retire for why that matters to your target.
The fair counterargument. Cost is certain, value is not, but value is real. Tax-aware withdrawal sequencing, Roth conversions inside a bracket, behavioral discipline in a crash and correct Social Security timing can each be worth more than a fee. The honest question is not "is 1% too much" but "am I getting more than 1% of decisions I would not have made alone".
Fee benchmarks: what is fair at your asset level
| Investable assets | Reasonable advisory fee | Reasonable all-in | Push back above |
|---|---|---|---|
| $100,000 | $1,500 to $3,000 flat, or hourly | 1.00% to 1.60% | 1.75% |
| $250,000 | 0.90% to 1.15% | 1.05% to 1.55% | 1.85% |
| $500,000 | 0.85% to 1.05% | 1.00% to 1.45% | 1.75% |
| $1,000,000 | 0.75% to 1.00% | 0.90% to 1.35% | 1.65% |
| $2,500,000 | 0.60% to 0.85% | 0.75% to 1.15% | 1.40% |
| $5,000,000 | 0.40% to 0.65% | 0.55% to 0.95% | 1.20% |
These bands sit at or below the survey medians on purpose. Paying the median is not a bargain, it is average.
- Get the fee schedule in writing. It is required to be in Item 5 of the adviser's Form ADV Part 2A brochure, along with other costs you may pay such as custody and fund expenses.
- Ask what is bundled. Barely 5% of advisors say their AUM fee is purely investment management; the rest bundle planning, and about half of advisors treat it as an even split between planning and portfolio work.
- Compare on dollars per year. A 0.85% fee on $1.4 million is $11,900. Ask whether $11,900 of work happens each year.
- Re-shop after a big balance change. Selling a business or rolling over a 401(k) often qualifies you for the next breakpoint. Firms rarely volunteer it.
- Check for third-party payments. Revenue sharing, 12b-1 fees and proprietary product use must be disclosed. Read the conflicts section before you sign.
Next step: how to choose a financial advisor covers the credential and background checks that go with the fee conversation. PolicySherpas advisory services are offered through a registered investment adviser, and nothing on this page is individualized investment, tax, or legal advice. Fee ranges are drawn from the cited industry research and vary by firm, state and service scope.
Sources & further reading
- Kitces.com — Independent Financial Advisor Fee Comparison: All-In Costs
- Kitces.com — How Much Does A Comprehensive Financial Plan Actually Cost?
- SEC Investor.gov — How Fees and Expenses Affect Your Investment Portfolio
- SEC Investor.gov — Mutual Fund and ETF Fees and Expenses
- SEC Investor.gov — Investor Bulletin: Form ADV Brochure and Brochure Supplement